Bonni's Nazi sheep show their love for Churchill by calling for a 9/11-sized terrorist attack in Britain.
Further to my post on Paul Weston and his fantasy-fascist version of Winston Churchill, Bonni the Holocaust denier is of course up in arms about Weston's arrest, as Liberty GB supply a lot of her material these days and half the comments on BareNakedIslam are repetitions of the same tape loop by an LGB supporter styling herself Linda Rivera. (She posted at least one comment on the Liberty GB thread where I added my tuppence-worth.)
Of course, Bonni doesn't restrict herself to wailing and greeting about Weston's arrest, oh no. She adds this:
England needs to have their own 9/11 to get it through their leftist dhimmi heads that ISLAM is the biggest threat they have ever faced and Muslims endanger their very existence.
Let's pass over the dodgy grammar - Bonni is a New Yorker from Kiev after all, so any level of English better than Hyman Kaplan's should be applauded rather than ridiculed - and consider the substance of that statement. Bonni thinks we (well, England - not sure if she means just England or Britain as a whole) need to have a terrorist atrocity claiming nearly 3,000 lives in order to make us agree with her ideology. Gosh, and there I was almost beginning to think that trying to change people's minds by mass murder was something associated with Islam. Thanks, Bonni, your comment saved me from falling onto a dreadful Islamphobic error.
Bonni's sheep join in the call for a major terrorist attack on Britain, and some want Denmark bombed as well (well, OK, just Linda Rivera). There is some discussion (Bonni has wisely deleted some of the comments, but enough remain) about obtaining terrorist materials and carrying out attacks. An idiot styling herself Kriemhild demands that the woman who complained must be harassed by the fascist thugs, and that the police who had the nerve to arrest her darling Paully-Waully must also have their details published and their lives ruined. Peter35 says that while he doesn't "approve" of what Anders Breivik did, he "can certainly understand" why he acted that way (without condemning the perpetrator of Europe's worst ever terrorst atrocity of course). perceptor1 describes most British Muslims as "horribly inbred": hmm, racist much? (Sorry, what was that? What race is Islam? Well, last time I looked religions didn't breed, people - belonging to races - did that.)
And Americans are endlessly amusing on British gun laws. Here is "Buck Diamond":
Don, they have no weapons. Over the past 20 years, England has passed gun laws essentially removing all guns from the public. Zip, even fox hunting.
First of all, that's utter bollocks. I walked past a gun shop this morning where with the appropriate paperwork I could have bought a shotgun. There are plenty of hunting rifles around too: in the area where we have our holiday flat two major sources of tourist revenue are deer stalking and grouse shooting. You can't just wander in and buy them without going through the paperwork, like Arnie in The Terminator (not even a plasma rifle in the 50W range), but you can buy guns. What you can't do, and never could, is wander around the street with them. Haul out your hunting rifle when you're not on a hunt and a nice police marksman will remodel your brain stem. Wandering around armed was historically the preserve of the nobility: serfs waving weapons ended up as tree decorations. There has never been a tradition of the man on the street owning guns in Britain: it was - and is - something mainly confined to toffs like David Cameron and some farmers. Now even the nobility have to keep their guns cased until they have a legitimate target for them. The only change in recent years is the more or less total ban on handguns. I shot pistols a few times as a student, though I never owned one. Now the sport is pretty much dead in Britain, the legacy of Thomas Hamilton who was responsible for the British equivalent of the Sandy Hook massacre. (And in the course of so doing came very close to depriving Britain of its first Wimbledon winner for decades.) But then, handguns outside a shooting range are no use for anything except killing people, so nobody really misses them.
Oh, and Buck, lovey, while farmers are allowed to shoot foxes threatening their stock (and always have been), fox-hunting was never, ever, done with guns. Jeez, do you American ignoramuses not even watch the television we send you?