Must be because Islam isn't a race that Bonni and her fellow enthusiasts for genocide sweep up so many non-Muslims in their ethnic cleansing attempts
If you were reading this blog back in November 2011 you may recall this post (just kidding, I don't really imagine you remember it) in which I drew attention to Bonni Benstock-Intall's utter lack of concern about Sikhs' being murdered by mistake for Muslims:
June 29, 2011 at 7:59 PM
Sikhs and Hindus wear turbans, not Muzzies. Just want you to get it straight so that if you all go on a rampage in England or wherever, you won’t do what some stupid fundies did in AZ and kill a Sikh.
to which Bonni replied:
June 29, 2011 at 8:54 PM
Big deal, one Sikh got killed by someone thinking it was a muslim. Next?
So back then she wasn't bothered about non-Muslims getting killed just as long as people were trying (and usually succeeding) to kill Muslims. Because, hey, they're all filthy smelly brown-skinned sub-humans, right?
Back in February she wasn't worried about mistaken identity murders either. Indeed, when CAIR suggested that killing a Sikh by mistake for a Muslim should be treated as a hate crime, she decided that this meant that they wanted only attacks on Muslims to be treated as hate crimes. (Yes, I know, children, that's exactly the opposite of what CAIR asked for. Next?)
But in between, Bonni has had twinges of fake concern for Sikhs. Here, for example, she suggest that it would be a good idea if they took steps to protect themselves agauinst being mistaken for Muslims, for example by wearing big signs saying "SIKH" on them. Well, Bonni's idol Adolf had a similar idea: he made sure non-Jews wouldn't be mistaken for Jews by making all the Jews wear big yellow stars. What both cases have in common, of course, is the tacit assumption that the murderous attacks on the "sub-humans" must continue.
And now, a few days ago, Bonni publishes a guide to turbans so that potential murderers can more accurately target the Muslims she wants them to kill. She says as much:
Many people mistake Sikhs for Muslims due to their turbans, which often makes Sikhs targets of attacks meant for Muslims. Please study the differences in Sikh (right) and Muslim headgear below. You might be able to save a Sikh’s life one day.
That's "save a Sikh's life" as in "murder somebody else".
When a Muslim-hating loon murdered a Hindu in New York just before Christmas, the lesson Bonni took from it was that all Muslims should leave New York because it wasn't safe for them (har, har). When a commenter pointed out that the victim was, in fact, a Hindu. here's what she had to say:
December 29, 2012 @ 7:34 pm
According to the New York Times the man murdered by this idiot was a Hindu.
This one not appropriate for BNI. I suggest you may want to take it down.
December 29, 2012 @ 8:03 pm
XY, the point is that she thought he was a Muslim.
December 29, 2012 @ 8:22 pm
No, the point is that he is NOT a Muslim and he was murdered by a lunatic who would have killed a dark skinned Safardi Jew as well. This post will be hurtful to his family and friends and there are more than enough other an better issues for BNI to post about than a murder of an innocent man.
December 29, 2012 @ 8:27 pm
You totally miss the point. But since you are not my employer, I don’t have to bow to your request
The "point", of course, being that it doesn't matter to Bonni what kind of brown-skinned Untermensch gets killed provided that there are plenty of killings and that the Muslims are terrorized by the knowledge that they are the intended target. Indeed, even killing white-skinned, blue-eyed Nordic children is fine by her if it's intended to send a signal that Muslim immigration must stop. (Yet to her head-shaking incomprehansion, the foolish Norwegian government persists in blaming the murders on a white supremacist terrorist instead of on brown sub-humans.)